World Health Organization Warning of Imminent ‘Extreme Weather Events’

“The World Health Organization is now warning us of imminent ‘extreme weather events.”

Author: DJ Mello/Alster Lincoln

World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus has said climate change will drive a surge in “extreme weather events” in 2023, pointing to record-breaking temperatures around the globe this week.

Speaking during a Wednesday press briefing, Tedros said “climate crisis” is now among the “major factors determining human health outcomes,” warning that global warming could ultimately produce a “wave of hunger, migration, and disease.”

“Over the coming months, we expect a range of extreme weather events, including droughts, floods, hurricanes, and heatwaves, all of which harm human health,” he said, also noting that Monday marked the “hottest day on record” for average temperatures around the world.

Call me crazy, but shouldn’t global warming be a thing that affects the entire globe, at all times, and not just places like Phoenix Arizona, or the African continent or places that line up close to the equator?

Just an observation from my part, but Chicago for instance hasn’t had a one hundred degree day since 1960. Is Chicago not part of the globe? I think that’s an honest question to an honest observation because what the Director claims is not applying to Chicago where the weather has been mild, and I mean as mild as sixty degrees during record-breaking weather according to the WHO.

Hot environments will always be hot, and to sell the idea that global warming is the cause to all these disasters projected by the experts is quite left field-ish.

I say that because most of the deadliest natural disasters took place before the industrial revolution was even thought of. Like the hurricane that devastated Galveston Texas in 1900, and 1903. It is called the deadliest natural disaster by Wikipedia for the US [1900]. 

Therefore, it’s a stretch to subscribe to half the stuff being pushed by these institutions that never mention such giants of the past, such as these hurricanes and other natural disasters like earthquakes: Which significantly have claimed more lives than anything we’ve seen since the turn of the Twentieth Century. I’ll supply you with data of a few of deadliest earthquakes per centur: On December 13, 115 AD Antioch experienced a 7.5, quake that claimed approximately 260, 000 lives. On May 19, 526, again Antioch Turkey went through a 7.0, magnitude that killed 250,000 souls. In Qumis Iran, on December 22, 865 AD, a 7.9 earthquake killed 200,000 people.

Between the 13th and 17th centuries, quakes didn’t slow down: Jordan Valley, December 1033, 70,000 died in a quake. October 11, 1138, Aleppo Syria, 230,000 deaths there. The following year, September 30, 1139, 7.7 quake in Ganja, Azerbaijan, 300,000, died. Before the earthquake of the next century took place, killing 1,100,000 people, in 1201, and 1202 in a 7.6 that kept killing through famine and disease, as Mr. Tedros warns us in his statement, but millions had perished in the last century due to earthquakes and the aftermath before 1201. 

So, to say that natural disasters are somehow worse now than in past times is to utterly miscalculate the field of disasters, and what’s important is to line things up Biblically so that we are not ignorant of the times, then, and now! Remember, I stopped at 1202 AD because there are many more to follow, but the point was made. At least I hope!

The day the Lord was crucified an earthquake took place. Not sure how many people died that day from the event, but we know that the veil of the temple was torn in half from top to bottom when the earthquake took place. We also know that Jesus said in Matthew 24:7, that there would be earthquakes in various places, famines, and pestilences to usher the end times.

Kinda like what Tedros said, but not in the same manner or intention. Jesus was talking about the end of the age, and we know what the agenda is all about in today’s politics and scientific community in the unison of depopulation.

It would be like having a renowned zoologist tell us that the elephant is the greatest creature that’s ever lived, simply because there are no more dinosaurs, and for us to know for sure if that’s true, it would be necessary on our part to research history on the subject. Same way here. We don’t have to make global warming the big bad wolf, the book of Revelation clearly states that the Sun will scorch humans [Rev. 16:8] as the great city [Jerusalem] gets split in half.

In other words, in order to blame the climate for natural disasters and blame mankind for such climate catastrophes, we would have to conclude that in 1201, the people of that day were at their worst when it comes to carbon footprints. Ironically, the same people who champion climate change are the same people who advocate for a nuclear strike from Russia in the current unnecessary war in Ukraine.

Can Revelation 16:8 be the outcome of a nuclear strike? Maybe! But the Bible does tell us that a third of the waters will be poisoned, and a third of vegetation will be burned [Rev. 8:7], and a third of the fish will die due to contamination, via a comet [Rev.8:9]. A third of drinking water will be poisoned, [Rev. 8:10]. One more third thing taking place is, a third of mankind will be killed because of war, and the result of all these judgments [Rev. 8:12].

I don’t believe the Church will be here to experience such catastrophes, and what a sad time to be alive knowing judgment has come to mankind one last time.

At the end of the day, the Bible is clear that the climate is not to be blamed for what’s to come, but, sin is. Sin will cause a righteous God to judge sin, and the only way to avoid the wrath of God is to accept His Son as Lord and Savior. Romans 10:9 tells us that if we confess Jesus with our mouth, and believe in our hearts He rose from the dead, we will be saved. I hope you take that step and avoid the ultimate judgment.